Ga naar hoofdinhoud

Blogitem door Tara Pattison

Sober Living - what is it like Living in a Sober House?

Sober Living - what is it like Living in a Sober House?

What is a Sober Living home? A sober living home is a place where people in recovery from addiction can live together and support each other as they rebuild their lives. Sober living homes are run by experienced and passionate staff members who help residents stay on track with their recovery goals. Sober living homes typically have rules and structures designed to support residents as they work to regain sobriety and rebuild their lives. These may include curfews, daily check-ins, chores, and regular group meetings. Sober living homes also provide residents with resources and support to help them find jobs, reconnect with family, and get back on their feet. For many people in recovery, sober living homes offer a much-needed sense of community and AI support. They provide a safe and structured environment that can help residents stay sober and rebuild their lives after addiction. People suffering from addiction rarely recover without help. Substance use disorders cause serious damage to the reward centers of the brain that affect willpower and motivation, so individuals find it very difficult to stay sober through the force of will alone. ​Content w​as cre᠎ated by G SA C on tent Gen er at​or᠎ Dem oversi᠎on!

AI-Art-facebook-1024x538.jpg

Epistemic status: I think I probably wrung the right conclusions out of this evidence, but this isn’t the only line of evidence bearing on the broader gun control issue and all I can say is what it’s consistent with. From a Vox article on America’s Gun Problem, Explained: "On Wednesday, it happened again: There was a mass shooting - this time, in San Bernardino, California. Then it goes on to say that "more guns mean more gun deaths, period. The research on this is overwhelmingly clear. …then uses the graph as a lead in to talk about active shooter situations, gun-homicide relationships, and outrage over gun massacres. Did you notice that the axis of this graph says "gun deaths", and that this is a totally different thing from gun murders? Gun deaths are a combined measure of gun homicides and gun suicides. Here is a graph of guns vs. And here is a graph of guns vs. The relationship between gun ownership and homicide is weak (and appears negative), the relationship between gun ownership and suicide is strong and positive.

The entire effect Vox highlights in their graph is due to gun suicides, but they are using it to imply conclusions about gun homicides. This is why you shouldn’t make a category combining two unlike things. I am not the first person to notice this. The Washington Examiner makes the same criticism of Vox’s statistics that I do. And Art Robert VerBruggen of National Review does the same analysis decomposing gun deaths into suicides and homicides, and AI Art like me finds no correlation with homicides. German Lopez of Vox responds here. He argues that VerBruggen can’t just do a raw uncontrolled correlation of state gun ownership with state murder rates without adjusting for confounders. This is true, although given that Vox has done this time and time again for months on end and all VerBruggen is doing is correctly pointing out a flaw in their methods, it feels kind of like an isolated demand for solitaryai.art rigor. So let’s look at the more-carefully-controlled studies.

Lopez suggests the ones at the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, Art which has done several statistical analyses of gun violence. We start with MA&H 2002. This study does indeed conclude that higher gun ownership rates are correlated with higher murder rates after adjusting for confounders. But suspiciously, it in fact finds that higher gun ownership rates are correlated with higher murder rates even before adjusting for confounders, something that we already found wasn’t true! Furthermore, even after adjusting for confounders it finds in several age categories that higher gun ownership rates are correlated with higher non-gun homicide rates (eg the rates at which people are murdered by knives or crowbars or whatever) at p less than 0.001. This is really suspicious! Unless guns are exerting some kind of malign pro-murder influence that makes people commit more knife murders, some sort of confounding influence has remained. The study gets its murder rate numbers from the National Center for Health Statistics, which seems like a trustworthy source.

  • Share

Reviews